Athlon 64 2700+ vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3166not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.68no data
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)NewCastle (2004)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)April 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K128 KB
L2 cache512K512 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data130 nm
Die size193 mm2144 mm2
Number of transistors106 million69 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt32 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1no data

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 32 Watt

Athlon 64 2700+ has 9.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Athlon 64 2700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
AMD Athlon 64 2700+
Athlon 64 2700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ or Athlon 64 2700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.