Athlon X2 5000+ vs Microsoft SQ1
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1719 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Qualcomm Snapdragon | no data |
| Designer | Microsoft | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019) | Regor (2009−2013) |
| Release date | 2 October 2019 (6 years ago) | October 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Microsoft SQ1 and Athlon X2 5000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 117 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 410 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Microsoft SQ1 and Athlon X2 5000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | + 2 MB | 65 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Athlon X2 5000+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Athlon X2 5000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Qualcomm Adreno 685 | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Microsoft SQ1 and Athlon X2 5000+.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 45 nm |
Microsoft SQ1 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Microsoft SQ1 and AMD Athlon X2 5000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 5000+ is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
