Microsoft SQ1 vs Athlon II X2 240

Place in the ranking	2742	1484
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.28	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Qualcomm Snapdragon
Power efficiency	0.96	0.12
Architecture codename	Regor (2009−2013)	Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 495) (2019)
Release date	23 July 2009 (15 years ago)	2 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$35	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 240 and Microsoft SQ1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	2	8
Base clock speed	2.8 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	2.8 GHz	3 GHz
L1 cache	256 KB	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	no data
L3 cache	0 KB	2 MB
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm
Die size	117 mm²	no data
Number of transistors	410 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 240 and Microsoft SQ1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	AM3	no data
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	3000 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Microsoft SQ1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Qualcomm Adreno 685

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Microsoft SQ1.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 240 0.66

Microsoft SQ1 3.68
+458%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 240 1042

Microsoft SQ1 5822
+459%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.66	3.68
Recency	23 July 2009	2 October 2019
Physical cores	2	8
Threads	2	8
Chip lithography	45 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	3000 Watt

Athlon II X2 240 has 4515.4% lower power consumption.

Microsoft SQ1, on the other hand, has a 457.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Microsoft SQ1 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 240 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X2 240 is a desktop processor while Microsoft SQ1 is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 240 and Microsoft SQ1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.