EPYC 4244P vs M3-8100Y
Primary details
Comparing M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 368 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 56.12 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core M3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.20 |
| Architecture codename | Amber Lake (2018−2019) | Raphael (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 28 August 2018 (6 years ago) | 21 May 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $281 | $229 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.1 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 16 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | no data | 71 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 6,570 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 29.861 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 10 | 28 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 28 August 2018 | 21 May 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 5 Watt | 65 Watt |
M3-8100Y has 1200% lower power consumption.
EPYC 4244P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that M3-8100Y is a notebook processor while EPYC 4244P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between M3-8100Y and EPYC 4244P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
