Ryzen 7 7700 vs Core i9-9900T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i9-9900T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
8.59
Ryzen 7 7700
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
22.33
+160%

Ryzen 7 7700 outperforms i9-9900T by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking867223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.1750.75
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i9AMD Ryzen 7
Architecture codenameCoffee Lake-R (2018−2019)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$439$339

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 7700 has 608% better value for money than i9-9900T.

Detailed specifications

Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz5.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache2 MB8 MB
L3 cache16 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14++ nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size178 mm271+122 mm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151AM5 (LGA 1718)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65W, (85W real world)

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data5 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
SIPP+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics 630AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1624

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i9-9900T 8.59
Ryzen 7 7700 22.33
+160%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i9-9900T 13280
Ryzen 7 7700 34536
+160%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i9-9900T 1469
Ryzen 7 7700 2881
+96.1%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i9-9900T 5984
Ryzen 7 7700 14968
+150%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i9-9900T 6758
Ryzen 7 7700 8345
+23.5%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i9-9900T 31357
Ryzen 7 7700 53881
+71.8%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i9-9900T 10259
Ryzen 7 7700 18277
+78.2%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i9-9900T 5.88
Ryzen 7 7700 2.72
+116%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i9-9900T 12
Ryzen 7 7700 34
+177%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i9-9900T 1112
Ryzen 7 7700 3047
+174%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i9-9900T 185
Ryzen 7 7700 308
+66.5%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i9-9900T 2.09
Ryzen 7 7700 3.64
+74.2%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

i9-9900T 4.6
Ryzen 7 7700 15.9
+246%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

i9-9900T 6109
Ryzen 7 7700 14860
+143%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

i9-9900T 70
Ryzen 7 7700 175
+149%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

i9-9900T 173
Ryzen 7 7700 368
+112%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.59 22.33
Integrated graphics card 3.09 4.35
Recency 23 April 2019 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

i9-9900T has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 7700, on the other hand, has a 160% higher aggregate performance score, 40.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 7 7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-9900T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i9-9900T and Ryzen 7 7700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i9-9900T
Core i9-9900T
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
Ryzen 7 7700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 41 vote

Rate Core i9-9900T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1046 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i9-9900T or Ryzen 7 7700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.