Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U vs Itanium 9310
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 590 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | no data | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| Release date | 1 January 2010 (15 years ago) | 3 May 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 5.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 10 MB L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | FCLGA1248 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 8 MB + 16 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 50 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | + | no data |
Security technologies
Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Itanium 9310 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 January 2010 | 3 May 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 8 Watt |
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U has an age advantage of 13 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 1525% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Itanium 9310 and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Itanium 9310 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
