Ryzen 5 7535HS vs GX-210JA
Primary details
Comparing GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 670 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 24 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 31.28 |
| Architecture codename | Temash (2013) | Rembrandt-R (2023) |
| Release date | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | 4.55 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 208 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FT3 BGA | FP7 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 660M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 May 2013 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 2 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 35 Watt |
GX-210JA has 483.3% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 7535HS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between GX-210JA and Ryzen 5 7535HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
