Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS vs FX-9830P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9830P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.10
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
19.20
+814%

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS outperforms FX-9830P by a whopping 814% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1870297
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridgeno data
Power efficiency5.6840.38
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.2 GHz
L1 cache320 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per module)1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size250 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors3,100 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFP4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9830P 2.10
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 19.20
+814%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9830P 3332
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS 30494
+815%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.10 19.20
Integrated graphics card 1.95 18.30
Recency 31 May 2016 16 April 2024
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

FX-9830P has 28.6% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, on the other hand, has a 814.3% higher aggregate performance score, 838.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-9830P in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-9830P is a notebook processor while Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9830P or Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.