Processor N200 vs FX-9800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9800P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.65
+5.1%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core threads, 6 Watt
1.57

FX-9800P outperforms Processor N200 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9800P and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19872025
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeIntel Alder Lake-N
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Alder Lake-N
Release date1 June 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$926 no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9800P and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads444 x 3.7  GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Base clock speed2.7 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-9800P and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataIntel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9800P and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8no data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-9800P and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9800P and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9800P and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4DDR4, DDR54800 MHz Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9800P and Processor N200.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9800P 1.65
+5.1%
Processor N200 1.57

FX-9800P outperforms Processor N200 by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-9800P 14.4
+80.5%
Processor N200 25.99

Processor N200 outperforms FX-9800P by 80% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX-9800P 3
+4.8%
Processor N200 3

FX-9800P outperforms Processor N200 by 5% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 236
+7.8%
Processor N200 219

FX-9800P outperforms Processor N200 by 8% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

FX-9800P 74
Processor N200 113
+52.7%

Processor N200 outperforms FX-9800P by 53% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

FX-9800P 0.91
Processor N200 1.36
+49.5%

Processor N200 outperforms FX-9800P by 49% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.65 1.57
Integrated graphics card 1.95 3.04
Recency 1 June 2016 3 January 2023
Threads 4 44 x 3.7 GHz Intel Crestmont E-Core
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 6 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-9800P and Processor N200.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9800P and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9800P
FX-9800P
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 43 votes

Rate FX-9800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 111 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9800P or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.