VIA Nano U2250 vs FX-9590

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads, 220 Watt
6.36
+5682%
VIA Nano U2250
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 10 Watt
0.11

FX-9590 outperforms VIA Nano U2250 by a whopping 5682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10833392
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataVIA Nano
Power efficiency2.751.05
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Isaiah (2009)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads81
Base clock speed4.7 GHzno data
Boost clock speed5 GHz1.5 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+NanoBGA2
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.36
+5682%
VIA Nano U2250 0.11

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-9590 10194
+5595%
VIA Nano U2250 179

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.36 0.11
Recency 6 July 2013 1 January 2009
Physical cores 8 1
Threads 8 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 10 Watt

FX-9590 has a 5681.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

VIA Nano U2250, on the other hand, has 2100% lower power consumption.

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the VIA Nano U2250 in performance tests.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while VIA Nano U2250 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and VIA Nano U2250, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
VIA Nano U2250
Nano U2250

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 968 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 23 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or VIA Nano U2250, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.