EPYC 9565 vs FX-9590

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and EPYC 9565 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1063not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.76no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Turin (2024)
Release date6 July 2013 (11 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$10,486

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and EPYC 9565 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)72 (Doheptaconta-Core)
Threads8144
Base clock speed4.7 GHz3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm212x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million99,780 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and EPYC 9565 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM3+SP5
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 9565. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 9565 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 9565. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and EPYC 9565.

PCIe versionn/a5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2013 10 October 2024
Physical cores 8 72
Threads 8 144
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 400 Watt

FX-9590 has 81.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9565, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 800% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-9590 and EPYC 9565. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-9590 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9565 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and EPYC 9565, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD EPYC 9565
EPYC 9565

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 951 vote

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9565 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or EPYC 9565, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.