C-50 vs FX-9370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9370 and C-50 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.20no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD C-Series
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date6 July 2013 (10 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$162 $83

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-9370 and C-50 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size315 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9370 and C-50 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and C-50. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and C-50 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and C-50. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6250

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and C-50.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9370 6167
+2227%
C-50 265

FX-9370 outperforms C-50 by 2227% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9370 512
+611%
C-50 72

FX-9370 outperforms C-50 by 611% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9370 2047
+1551%
C-50 124

FX-9370 outperforms C-50 by 1551% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 July 2013 4 January 2011
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 9 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-9370 and C-50. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while C-50 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9370 and C-50, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9370
FX-9370
AMD C-50
C-50

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 152 votes

Rate FX-9370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 259 votes

Rate C-50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9370 or C-50, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.