A4-4000 vs FX-9590

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-9590
2013
8 cores / 8 threads
6.59
+779%

FX-9590 outperforms A4-4000 by 779% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-9590 and A4-4000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9532546
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.983.94
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date6 July 2013 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price$298 $35

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

A4-4000 has 99% better value for money than FX-9590.

Detailed specifications

FX-9590 and A4-4000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4.7 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature57 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data70 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-9590 and A4-4000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9590 and A4-4000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9590 and A4-4000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9590 and A4-4000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7480D

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9590 and A4-4000.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-9590 6.59
+779%
A4-4000 0.75

FX-9590 outperforms A4-4000 by 779% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-9590 10194
+784%
A4-4000 1153

FX-9590 outperforms A4-4000 by 784% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9590 546
+62.5%
A4-4000 336

FX-9590 outperforms A4-4000 by 63% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-9590 2181
+368%
A4-4000 466

FX-9590 outperforms A4-4000 by 368% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.59 0.75
Recency 6 July 2013 1 June 2013
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 65 Watt

The FX-9590 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4000 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9590 and A4-4000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9590
FX-9590
AMD A4-4000
A4-4000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 878 votes

Rate FX-9590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 310 votes

Rate A4-4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9590 or A4-4000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.