Opteron 148 vs FX-9370
Aggregate performance score
FX-9370 outperforms Opteron 148 by a whopping 1555% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1709 | 3487 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.70 | 0.11 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) |
| Release date | 6 July 2013 (12 years ago) | 2 August 2005 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of FX-9370 and Opteron 148: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | 115 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 57 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | 114 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.375 V - Max: 1.5375 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-9370 and Opteron 148 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | 939 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9370 and Opteron 148. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9370 and Opteron 148 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9370 and Opteron 148. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9370 and Opteron 148.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.64 | 0.22 |
| Recency | 6 July 2013 | 2 August 2005 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 85 Watt |
FX-9370 has a 1555% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 148, on the other hand, has 159% lower power consumption.
The AMD FX-9370 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 148 in performance tests.
Note that FX-9370 is a desktop processor while Opteron 148 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
