Ultra 7 265H vs FX-8800P
Primary details
Comparing FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2054 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Carrizo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 11.31 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | no data |
| Release date | 2 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 January 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Performance-cores | no data | 6 |
| Efficient-cores | no data | 8 |
| Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 5.3 GHz |
| L2 cache | 2048 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | no data |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 90 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA2049 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | HSA 1.0 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| DualGraphics | + | - |
| TrueAudio | + | - |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| PowerGating | + | - |
| Out-of-band client management | + | - |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| HSA | + | - |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| SIPP | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
| Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Secure Key | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
| IOMMU 2.0 | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | Intel® Arc™ 140T GPU |
| iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Enduro | + | - |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
| UVD | + | - |
| VCE | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 2.3 GHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 4 |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | no data | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
| Max resolution over eDP | no data | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | no data | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | 12.2 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 8 | 28 |
| PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 2 June 2015 | 1 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 115 Watt |
FX-8800P has 666.7% lower power consumption.
Ultra 7 265H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and Core Ultra 7 265H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
