Celeron M 743 vs FX-8800P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1910not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD CarrizoIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date3 June 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107
Current price$515 no data

Detailed specifications

FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3100 Million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP4BGA965
Power consumption (TDP)12-35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8800P and Celeron M 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHSA 1.0no data
AES-NI1no data
FMAFMA4no data
AVXAVXno data
FRTC1no data
FreeSync1no data
PowerTune-no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8800P and Celeron M 743. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8800P and Celeron M 743 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8800P and Celeron M 743.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

FX-8800P 2604
+96.7%
Celeron M 743 1324

FX-8800P outperforms Celeron M 743 by 97% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

FX-8800P 4227
+627%
Celeron M 743 582

FX-8800P outperforms Celeron M 743 by 627% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

FX-8800P 12.02
+913%
Celeron M 743 121.8

Celeron M 743 outperforms FX-8800P by 913% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2015 1 September 2009
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-8800P and Celeron M 743. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8800P and Celeron M 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8800P
FX-8800P
Intel Celeron M 743
Celeron M 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 95 votes

Rate FX-8800P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Celeron M 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8800P or Celeron M 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.