Ultra 7 258V vs FX-8370E

Primary details

Comparing FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1571	616
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.70	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Power efficiency	3.33	68.86
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date	2 September 2014 (10 years ago)	24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	8 (Octa-Core)	8 (Octa-Core)
Threads	8	8
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.3 GHz	4.8 GHz
Bus rate	no data	37 MHz
L1 cache	no data	192 KB (per core)
L2 cache	8192 KB	2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache	no data	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	3 nm
Die size	315 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	100 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	+	-
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	-
AVX	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	+
TSX	-	+

Security technologies

FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT

no data

+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-d	no data	+
VT-x	no data	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe version	n/a	5.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	3.34	12.37
Recency	2 September 2014	24 September 2024
Chip lithography	32 nm	3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8370E and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---