FX-8370E vs i7-2600

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i7-2600
2011
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.37
+0.9%
FX-8370E
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
3.34

Core i7-2600 outperforms FX-8370E by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15751583
Place by popularity62not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.580.70
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.363.33
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date9 January 2011 (13 years ago)2 September 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$247$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-8370E has 21% better value for money than i7-2600.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed3.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8192 KB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size216 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C71 °C
Number of transistors1,160 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.075 V - Max: 1.2875 V

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA1155AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.35 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E.

PCIe version2.0n/a
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-2600 3.37
+0.9%
FX-8370E 3.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i7-2600 5346
+0.8%
FX-8370E 5306

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i7-2600 5020
FX-8370E 7570
+50.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.37 3.34
Recency 9 January 2011 2 September 2014
Physical cores 4 8

i7-2600 has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score.

FX-8370E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 100% more physical cores.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-2600 and FX-8370E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-2600
Core i7-2600
AMD FX-8370E
FX-8370E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2786 votes

Rate Core i7-2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 87 votes

Rate FX-8370E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-2600 or FX-8370E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.