Celeron Dual-Core T1600 vs FX-8370

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8370
2014
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.49
+546%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.54

FX-8370 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T1600 by a whopping 546% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16353027
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.93no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron Dual-Core
Power efficiency1.180.65
DesignerAMDIntel
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date2 September 2014 (10 years ago)1 May 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus rateno data667 MHz
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size315 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-8370 3.49
+546%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-8370 6159
+548%
Celeron Dual-Core T1600 950

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.49 0.54
Recency 2 September 2014 1 May 2008
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

FX-8370 has a 546.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron Dual-Core T1600, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

The AMD FX-8370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600 in performance tests.

Note that FX-8370 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T1600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8370
FX-8370
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T1600
Celeron Dual-Core T1600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 403 votes

Rate FX-8370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 14 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8370 and Celeron Dual-Core T1600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.