Xeon W-1270 vs FX-8320

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads
3.53

Xeon W-1270 outperforms FX-8320 by 223% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1434620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.426.65
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)no data
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)1 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price$110 $1991

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1270 has 368% better value for money than FX-8320.

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5 GHz
L2 cache8192 KBno data
L3 cacheno data16 MB Intel® Smart Cache
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protectionno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics P630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Videono data+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.2 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.53
Xeon W-1270 11.41
+223%

Xeon W-1270 outperforms FX-8320 by 223% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-8320 5454
Xeon W-1270 17641
+223%

Xeon W-1270 outperforms FX-8320 by 223% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320 459
Xeon W-1270 1696
+269%

Xeon W-1270 outperforms FX-8320 by 269% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-8320 1818
Xeon W-1270 8108
+346%

Xeon W-1270 outperforms FX-8320 by 346% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.53 11.41
Recency 23 October 2012 1 April 2020
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 80 Watt

The Xeon W-1270 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8320 in performance tests.

Be aware that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Xeon W-1270 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Xeon W-1270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Xeon W-1270
Xeon W-1270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1262 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-1270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Xeon W-1270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.