Xeon Platinum 9282 vs FX-8320

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1548not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Platinum
Power efficiency2.60no data
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Cascade Lake-AP (2019)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads8112
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data26
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache8192 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data77 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million8,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18
SocketAM3+Intel BGA5903
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Max memory channelsno data12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data281.6 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282.

PCIe versionn/ano data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 2 April 2019
Physical cores 8 56
Threads 8 112
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 400 Watt

FX-8320 has 220% lower power consumption.

Xeon Platinum 9282, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8320 is a desktop processor while Xeon Platinum 9282 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Xeon Platinum 9282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
Intel Xeon Platinum 9282
Xeon Platinum 9282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1389 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 376 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 9282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Xeon Platinum 9282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.