Athlon X4 760K vs FX-8320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-8320
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.43
+83.4%
Athlon X4 760K
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
1.87

FX-8320 outperforms Athlon X4 760K by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15601991
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.601.77
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data192K
L2 cache8192 KB4 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier++
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt100 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-8320 3.43
+83.4%
Athlon X4 760K 1.87

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-8320 5444
+83.1%
Athlon X4 760K 2973

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-8320 460
+5%
Athlon X4 760K 438

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-8320 1812
+74.4%
Athlon X4 760K 1039

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.43 1.87
Recency 23 October 2012 1 June 2013
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 100 Watt

FX-8320 has a 83.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon X4 760K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 25% lower power consumption.

The FX-8320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 760K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-8320 and Athlon X4 760K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8320
FX-8320
AMD Athlon X4 760K
Athlon X4 760K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1424 votes

Rate FX-8320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 250 votes

Rate Athlon X4 760K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-8320 or Athlon X4 760K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.