Atom N2650 vs FX-8140
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1845 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 1.23 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (13 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
FX-8140 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on FX-8140 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3,6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 3 Watt |
FX-8140 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Atom N2650, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8140 and Intel Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-8140 is a desktop processor while Atom N2650 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
