Atom N2650 vs FX-8140

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Power efficiency1.23no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Cedarview-M (2011−2012)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)5 January 2012 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-8140 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz1.73 GHz
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-8140 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt3,6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8140 and Atom N2650.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2012 5 January 2012
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 3 Watt

FX-8140 has an age advantage of 9 months, and 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Atom N2650, on the other hand, has 3066.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD FX-8140 and Intel Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that FX-8140 is a desktop processor while Atom N2650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-8140
FX-8140
Intel Atom N2650
Atom N2650

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 54 votes

Rate FX-8140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 8 votes

Rate Atom N2650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-8140 and Atom N2650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.