Atom N2650 vs FX-4130
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2345 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.32 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Power efficiency | 0.53 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Cedarview-M (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 (13 years ago) | 5 January 2012 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $112 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
FX-4130 and Atom N2650 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.73 GHz |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4130 and Atom N2650 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Atom N2650. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Atom N2650 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Atom N2650. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3600 (400 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Atom N2650.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 August 2012 | 5 January 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 3 Watt |
FX-4130 has an age advantage of 7 months, and 100% more physical cores.
Atom N2650, on the other hand, has 4066.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD FX-4130 and Intel Atom N2650. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that FX-4130 is a desktop processor while Atom N2650 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
