FX-4350 vs FX-7500

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-7500
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
2.07

FX-4350 outperforms FX-7500 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-7500 and FX-4350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking17871761
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.73
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Kaverino data
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date4 June 2014 (9 years ago)29 April 2013 (11 years ago)
Current price$267 $92

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-7500 and FX-4350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L2 cache4096 KB4096 KB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size245 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data61 °C
Number of transistors2410 Million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on FX-7500 and FX-4350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketFP3AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-7500 and FX-4350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-7500 and FX-4350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1+
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-7500 and FX-4350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600DDR3
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)
iGPU core count6no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-7500 and FX-4350 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-7500 and FX-4350 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-7500 and FX-4350.

PCIe version3.0n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-7500 2.07
FX-4350 2.14
+3.4%

FX-4350 outperforms FX-7500 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-7500 3209
FX-4350 3304
+3%

FX-4350 outperforms FX-7500 by 3% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 312
FX-4350 473
+51.6%

FX-4350 outperforms FX-7500 by 52% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-7500 700
FX-4350 1224
+74.9%

FX-4350 outperforms FX-7500 by 75% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.07 2.14
Recency 4 June 2014 29 April 2013
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 125 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-7500 and FX-4350.

Be aware that FX-7500 is a notebook processor while FX-4350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-7500 and FX-4350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-7500
FX-7500
AMD FX-4350
FX-4350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 76 votes

Rate FX-7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 505 votes

Rate FX-4350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-7500 or FX-4350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.