Ryzen 7 8840HS vs FX-6350

VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
3.00
Ryzen 7 8840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.01
+434%

Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms FX-6350 by a whopping 434% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1656447
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Power efficiency2.1952.14
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Hawk Point-HS (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads616
Base clock speed3.9 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size315 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier+-
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FP8
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataRyzen AI, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 3.00
Ryzen 7 8840HS 16.01
+434%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6350 4587
Ryzen 7 8840HS 24506
+434%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6350 482
Ryzen 7 8840HS 2032
+322%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6350 1525
Ryzen 7 8840HS 8906
+484%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.00 16.01
Recency 29 April 2013 6 December 2023
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 8840HS has a 433.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 346.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6350 in performance tests.

Note that FX-6350 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 8840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Ryzen 7 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
Ryzen 7 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 367 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 151 vote

Rate Ryzen 7 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Ryzen 7 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.