Phenom II X6 1065T vs FX-6350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6350
2013
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.94
+34.2%
Phenom II X6 1065T
2010
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.19

FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X6 1065T by a substantial 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15661753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.990.49
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Thuban (2010)
Release date29 April 2013 (11 years ago)7 December 2010 (13 years ago)
Current price$69 $109

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6350 has 102% better value for money than Phenom II X6 1065T.

Detailed specifications

FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads66
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB512 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size315 mm2346 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million904 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.25 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM3
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T.

PCIe versionn/a2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6350 2.94
+34.2%
Phenom II X6 1065T 2.19

FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X6 1065T by 34% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6350 4546
+34.2%
Phenom II X6 1065T 3387

FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X6 1065T by 34% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.94 2.19
Recency 29 April 2013 7 December 2010
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm

The FX-6350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Phenom II X6 1065T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6350 and Phenom II X6 1065T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6350
FX-6350
AMD Phenom II X6 1065T
Phenom II X6 1065T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 344 votes

Rate FX-6350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 129 votes

Rate Phenom II X6 1065T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6350 or Phenom II X6 1065T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.