Athlon X4 845 vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.67
+9%

FX-6300 outperforms Athlon X4 845 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16271681
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.321.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years ago)2 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price$64 $50

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 845 has 5% better value for money than FX-6300.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache288 KB320K
L2 cache6144 KB2 MB
L3 cache8192 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3-2133

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.67
+9%
Athlon X4 845 2.45

FX-6300 outperforms Athlon X4 845 by 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6300 4137
+9%
Athlon X4 845 3797

FX-6300 outperforms Athlon X4 845 by 9% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6300 461
Athlon X4 845 667
+44.7%

Athlon X4 845 outperforms FX-6300 by 45% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-6300 1448
Athlon X4 845 1656
+14.4%

Athlon X4 845 outperforms FX-6300 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

Benchmark coverage: 4%

FX-6300 4900
+17.2%
Athlon X4 845 4180

FX-6300 outperforms Athlon X4 845 by 17% in 3DMark Fire Strike Physics.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.67 2.45
Recency 23 October 2012 2 February 2016
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and Athlon X4 845, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD Athlon X4 845
Athlon X4 845

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3806 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 77 votes

Rate Athlon X4 845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or Athlon X4 845, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.