Athlon X4 860K vs FX-6330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6330
2015
6 cores / 6 threads, 125 Watt
2.87
+29.3%

FX-6330 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking15901752
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.890.49
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date15 December 2015 (8 years ago)12 August 2014 (9 years ago)
Current price$76 $78

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6330 has 82% better value for money than Athlon X4 860K.

Detailed specifications

FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache288 KB256K
L2 cache6 MB4 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6330 2.87
+29.3%
Athlon X4 860K 2.22

FX-6330 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-6330 4433
+29.4%
Athlon X4 860K 3426

FX-6330 outperforms Athlon X4 860K by 29% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.87 2.22
Recency 15 December 2015 12 August 2014
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 95 Watt

The FX-6330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 860K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6330 and Athlon X4 860K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6330
FX-6330
AMD Athlon X4 860K
Athlon X4 860K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 37 votes

Rate FX-6330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 238 votes

Rate Athlon X4 860K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6330 or Athlon X4 860K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.