A6-7470K vs FX-6300

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and A6-7470K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1627	2278
Place by popularity	57	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.32	0.05
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Vishera (2012−2015)	Godaveri (2014−2018)
Release date	23 October 2012 (11 years ago)	2 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Current price	$64	$216

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-6300 has 2540% better value for money than A6-7470K.

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and A6-7470K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	6	2
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	4 GHz
L1 cache	288 KB	256 KB
L2 cache	6144 KB	1024 KB
L3 cache	8192 KB	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	315 mm2	245 mm2
Maximum core temperature	71 °C	71 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	72 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	2,411 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	Min: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 V	no data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and A6-7470K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and A6-7470K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+
FRTC	no data	1
FreeSync	no data	1
PowerTune	no data	+
TrueAudio	no data	+
PowerNow	no data	-
PowerGating	no data	-
Out-of-band client management	no data	-
VirusProtect	no data	-
RAID	no data	-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and A6-7470K are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	+
IOMMU 2.0	no data	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and A6-7470K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1866	DDR3-2133
Max memory channels	no data	2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card	On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)	AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core count	no data	4
Number of pipelines	no data	256
Enduro	no data	+
Switchable graphics	no data	1
UVD	no data	+
VCE	no data	+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-6300 and A6-7470K integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort	no data	+
HDMI	no data	+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by FX-6300 and A6-7470K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX	no data	DirectX® 12
Vulkan	no data	1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and A6-7470K.

PCIe version	3.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 outperforms A6-7470K by 130% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.67	1.16
Recency	23 October 2012	2 February 2016
Physical cores	6	2
Threads	6	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	65 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and A6-7470K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---