Athlon X4 840 vs FX-4320

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads
2.02
Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads
2.17
+7.4%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms FX-4320 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18051743
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money4.007.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno data4x Athlon
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date23 October 2012 (11 years old)August 2014 (9 years old)
Current price$53 $45
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 840 has 85% better value for money than FX-4320.

Technical specs

FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache192 KB256K
L2 cache4096 KB4 MB
L3 cache4096 KBno data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size315 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors1,200 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe versionNot Listed3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 2.02
Athlon X4 840 2.17
+7.4%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms FX-4320 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4320 3094
Athlon X4 840 3319
+7.3%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms FX-4320 by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 2.02 2.17
Recency 23 October 2012 on August 2014
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 125 votes

Rate AMD FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 561 vote

Rate AMD Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.