A6-3400M vs FX-6300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-6300
2012
6 cores / 6 threads, 95 Watt
2.60
+247%
A6-3400M
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75

FX-6300 outperforms A6-3400M by a whopping 247% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-6300 and A6-3400M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17312667
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.64no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series
Power efficiency2.592.03
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$132no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-6300 and A6-3400M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads64
Base clock speed3.5 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.3 GHz
L1 cache288 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6144 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size315 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.15 V - Max: 1.3875 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-6300 and A6-3400M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+FS1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6300 and A6-3400M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6300 and A6-3400M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6300 and A6-3400M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 6520G (400 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6300 and A6-3400M.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6300 2.60
+247%
A6-3400M 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-6300 4137
+247%
A6-3400M 1193

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

FX-6300 456
+116%
A6-3400M 211

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

FX-6300 1431
+174%
A6-3400M 522

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.60 0.75
Recency 23 October 2012 14 June 2011
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 6 4
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-6300 has a 246.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

A6-3400M, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The FX-6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the A6-3400M in performance tests.

Note that FX-6300 is a desktop processor while A6-3400M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6300 and A6-3400M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6300
FX-6300
AMD A6-3400M
A6-3400M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4188 votes

Rate FX-6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 174 votes

Rate A6-3400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6300 or A6-3400M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.