Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary vs FX-6100

VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1809not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.31no data
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date12 October 2011 (13 years ago)29 April 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads616
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.35 GHz
L1 cache288 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors1,200 million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 October 2011 29 April 2019
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 6 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 105 Watt

FX-6100 has 10.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 33.3% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-6100 and Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-6100
FX-6100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary
Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 1110 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-6100 or Ryzen 7 2700X 50th Anniversary, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.