FX-6100 vs Ryzen 7 1700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 7 1700
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
9.58
+303%

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms FX-6100 by a whopping 303% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking7421692
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.192.99
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 7no data
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date2 March 2017 (7 years ago)12 October 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329no data
Current price$160 (0.5x MSRP)$39

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 7 1700 has 341% better value for money than FX-6100.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads166
Base clock speed3 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache768 KB288 KB
L2 cache4096 KB6 MB
L3 cache16384 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die size192 mm2315 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
FMAFMA3+
AVX++
XFR-no data
SenseMI+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100.

PCIe versionn/a2.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 7 1700 9.58
+303%
FX-6100 2.38

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms FX-6100 by 303% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 7 1700 14815
+302%
FX-6100 3682

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms FX-6100 by 302% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700 1008
+163%
FX-6100 384

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms FX-6100 by 163% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 7 1700 5115
+316%
FX-6100 1231

Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms FX-6100 by 316% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.58 2.38
Recency 2 March 2017 12 October 2011
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 6
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

The Ryzen 7 1700 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-6100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 7 1700 and FX-6100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 7 1700
Ryzen 7 1700
AMD FX-6100
FX-6100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1443 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 994 votes

Rate FX-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 7 1700 or FX-6100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.