FX-6200 vs Athlon X4 950

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1719	1636
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.66	0.51
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Architecture codename	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)	Zambezi (2011−2012)
Release date	27 July 2017 (6 years ago)	27 February 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$60	no data
Current price	$43 (0.7x MSRP)	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 950 has 618% better value for money than FX-6200.

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads	4	6
Base clock speed	3.5 GHz	3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	4.1 GHz
L1 cache	128 KB (per core)	288 KB
L2 cache	512 KB (per core)	6144 KB
L3 cache	0 KB	8192 KB
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Die size	246 mm2	315 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	61 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	74 °C	no data
Number of transistors	1,178 million	1,200 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	Yes
P0 Vcore voltage	no data	Min: 1.3 V - Max: 1.4125 V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM4	AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR4 Dual-channel

DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200.

PCIe version

no data

n/a

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-6200 outperforms Athlon X4 950 by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	2.32	2.65
Recency	27 July 2017	27 February 2012
Physical cores	4	6
Threads	4	6
Chip lithography	28 nm	32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	125 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 950 and FX-6200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---