Processor N200 vs FX-4320
Aggregate performance score
FX-4320 outperforms Processor N200 by a significant 27% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing FX-4320 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1927 | 2109 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
| Power efficiency | 1.97 | 24.61 |
| Architecture codename | Vishera (2012−2015) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| Release date | 23 October 2012 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $193 |
Detailed specifications
FX-4320 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 0.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 4096 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4320 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3+ | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
FX-4320 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3-1866 | DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Processor N200.
| PCIe version | Not Listed | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.98 | 1.56 |
| Recency | 23 October 2012 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 6 Watt |
FX-4320 has a 26.9% higher aggregate performance score.
Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.
The FX-4320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.
Note that FX-4320 is a desktop processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
