Processor N100 vs FX-4320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.99
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.36
+18.6%

Processor N100 outperforms FX-4320 by a moderate 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19251785
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.9737.07
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cache4096 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

FX-4320 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4, DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Processor N100.

PCIe versionNot Listed3.0
PCI Express lanesno data9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.99 2.36
Recency 23 October 2012 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 18.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4320 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 135 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1236 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.