Athlon 3000G vs FX-4320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4320
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.98
Athlon 3000G
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.82
+42.4%

Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-4320 by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19251670
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.27
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.977.63
Architecture codenameVishera (2012−2015)Zen+ (2018−2019)
Release date23 October 2012 (12 years ago)7 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$49

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache192 KB192 KB
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
L3 cache4096 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2209.78 mm2?
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
PowerNow-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1866DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB?
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G.

PCIe versionNot Listed3.0
PCI Express lanesno data6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4320 1.98
Athlon 3000G 2.82
+42.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

FX-4320 3150
Athlon 3000G 4482
+42.3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.98 2.82
Recency 23 October 2012 7 November 2019
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

FX-4320 has 100% more physical cores.

Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 3000G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4320 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4320 and Athlon 3000G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4320
FX-4320
AMD Athlon 3000G
Athlon 3000G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 135 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2093 votes

Rate Athlon 3000G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4320 or Athlon 3000G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.