FX-4320 vs Core i7-875K

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i7-875K
2010
4 cores / 8 threads
2.00

Primary details

Comparing Core i7-875K and FX-4320 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18191818
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.334.00
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date30 May 2010 (13 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$486no data
Current price$131 (0.3x MSRP)$53

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

FX-4320 has 1112% better value for money than i7-875K.

Detailed specifications

Core i7-875K and FX-4320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.93 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)4096 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size296 mm2315 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C71 °C
Number of transistors774 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i7-875K and FX-4320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i7-875K and FX-4320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i7-875K and FX-4320 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i7-875K and FX-4320 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i7-875K and FX-4320. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size16 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i7-875K and FX-4320.

PCIe version2.0Not Listed
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i7-875K 2.00
FX-4320 2.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i7-875K 3093
FX-4320 3094
+0%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 May 2010 23 October 2012
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i7-875K and FX-4320.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i7-875K and FX-4320, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i7-875K
Core i7-875K
AMD FX-4320
FX-4320

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 60 votes

Rate Core i7-875K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 125 votes

Rate FX-4320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i7-875K or FX-4320, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.