Xeon Gold 6338 vs FX-4170

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4170
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 125 Watt
1.96
Xeon Gold 6338
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
21.86
+1015%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms FX-4170 by a whopping 1015% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1859221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.4310.76
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)no data
Release date27 February 2012 (12 years ago)1 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$86 $3418

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6338 has 2402% better value for money than FX-4170.

Detailed specifications

FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed4.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4096 KBno data
L3 cache8192 KB48 MB
Chip lithography32 nm10 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature61 °C81 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1875 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3+FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338.

PCIe versionn/a4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4170 1.96
Xeon Gold 6338 21.86
+1015%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms FX-4170 by 1015% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4170 3034
Xeon Gold 6338 33814
+1015%

Xeon Gold 6338 outperforms FX-4170 by 1015% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 21.86
Recency 27 February 2012 1 April 2021
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon Gold 6338 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4170 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4170 is a desktop processor while Xeon Gold 6338 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4170 and Xeon Gold 6338, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4170
FX-4170
Intel Xeon Gold 6338
Xeon Gold 6338

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 71 vote

Rate FX-4170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4170 or Xeon Gold 6338, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.