Atom x7-Z8700 vs FX-4150

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FX-4150
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.90
+150%

FX-4150 outperforms Atom x7-Z8700 by a whopping 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21992923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno data7x Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.84no data
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release date23 October 2012 (13 years ago)2 March 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)95 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX+-

Security technologies

FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 600 MHz)
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data2
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

FX-4150 1.90
+150%
Atom x7-Z8700 0.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

FX-4150 3010
+128%
Samples: 45
Atom x7-Z8700 1322
Samples: 353

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 0.76
Recency 23 October 2012 2 March 2015
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

FX-4150 has a 150% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x7-Z8700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 129% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD FX-4150 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Atom x7-Z8700 in performance tests.

Note that FX-4150 is a desktop processor while Atom x7-Z8700 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate FX-4150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 25 votes

Rate Atom x7-Z8700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors FX-4150 and Atom x7-Z8700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.