Pentium 4 P4 3.0 vs FX-4130
Aggregate performance score
FX-4130 outperforms Pentium 4 P4 3.0 by a whopping 711% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2264 | 3445 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.31 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Pentium 4 |
| Power efficiency | 0.52 | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zambezi (2011−2012) | Northwood (2002−2004) |
| Release date | 27 August 2012 (12 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $112 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.8 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 400 MHz |
| L2 cache | 4096 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
| P0 Vcore voltage | Min: 1.2875 V - Max: 1.4125 V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM3+ | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 89 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4130 and Pentium 4 P4 3.0.
| PCIe version | n/a | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.54 | 0.19 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 89 Watt |
FX-4130 has a 710.5% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium 4 P4 3.0, on the other hand, has 40.4% lower power consumption.
The AMD FX-4130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium 4 P4 3.0 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
