Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G vs FX-4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
1.68

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-4100 by 321% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1946915
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2439.05
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Renoir (2020−2022)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)21 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$28 $106

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G has 16171% better value for money than FX-4100.

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4096 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache8192 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm12 nm
Die size315 mm2156 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 million9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3+AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.

PCIe versionn/a3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.68
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 7.07
+321%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-4100 by 321% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4100 2605
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 10933
+320%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-4100 by 320% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-4100 404
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 1453
+260%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-4100 by 260% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

FX-4100 1023
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G 4670
+357%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms FX-4100 by 357% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.68 7.07
Recency 12 October 2011 21 July 2020
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-4100 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 818 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 430 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.