EPYC 9015 vs Athlon XP 3200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3269not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.22no data
Architecture codenameBarton (2001−2004)Turin (2024)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$527

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads116
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.1 GHz
L1 cache128 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size101 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors63 million16,630 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketASP5
Power consumption (TDP)77 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 16
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 77 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon XP 3200+ has 62.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9015, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon XP 3200+ is a desktop processor while EPYC 9015 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 3200+ and EPYC 9015, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 3200+
Athlon XP 3200+
AMD EPYC 9015
EPYC 9015

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 24 votes

Rate Athlon XP 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9015 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 3200+ or EPYC 9015, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.