Core i3-7102E vs FX-4100

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX-4100
2011
4 cores / 4 threads
1.68
+3.1%
Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads
1.63

FX-4100 outperforms Core i3-7102E by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19401964
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.24no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Architecture codenameZambezi (2011−2012)Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Release date12 October 2011 (12 years ago)3 January 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$225
Current price$28 no data

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data8 GT/s
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache4096 KB512 KB
L3 cache8192 KB3 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size315 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,200 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
P0 Vcore voltageMin: 1.1 V - Max: 1.4125 Vno data

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3+no data
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E.

PCIe versionn/a3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 1.68
+3.1%
i3-7102E 1.63

FX-4100 outperforms Core i3-7102E by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

FX-4100 2605
+3.3%
i3-7102E 2521

FX-4100 outperforms Core i3-7102E by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.68 1.63
Recency 12 October 2011 3 January 2017
Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 25 Watt

We couldn't decide between FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E. The differences in performance seem too small.

Note that FX-4100 is a desktop processor while Core i3-7102E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and Core i3-7102E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-4100
FX-4100
Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 803 votes

Rate FX-4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-4100 or Core i3-7102E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.