A9-9420 vs FX-4100

Primary details

Comparing FX-4100 and A9-9420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1990	2416
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.24	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	AMD Bristol Ridge
Architecture codename	Zambezi (2011−2012)	Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	12 October 2011 (12 years ago)	1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

FX-4100 and A9-9420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	3 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.9 GHz	3.6 GHz
L1 cache	192 KB	160 KB
L2 cache	4 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Die size	315 mm2	124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	no data	74 °C
Number of transistors	1,200 million	1200 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No

Compatibility

Information on FX-4100 and A9-9420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	AM3+	BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	10-25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-4100 and A9-9420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	Virtualization,
AES-NI	+	+
FMA	+	+
AVX	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-4100 and A9-9420 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

+

+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-4100 and A9-9420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

DDR3

DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Radeon R5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-4100 and A9-9420.

PCIe version	2.0	3.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX-4100 outperforms A9-9420 by 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.69	0.97
Recency	12 October 2011	1 June 2016
Physical cores	4	2
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	32 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between FX-4100 and A9-9420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---