Ryzen 3 3100U vs EPYC Embedded 9755

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

EPYC Embedded 9755
2025
128 cores / 256 threads, 500 Watt
95.83
+4789%

EPYC Embedded 9755 outperforms Ryzen 3 3100U by a whopping 4789% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking32285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.935.41
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerTSMCGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameTurin (2024−2025)Picasso (2019−2026)
Release date11 March 2025 (1 year ago)June 2026 (recently)

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1282 (Dual-core)
Threads2562
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache512 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography4 nm12 nm
Die size16x 70.6 mm2210 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Number of transistors133,040 million4,940 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketSP5FP5
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Vega 8

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U.

PCIe version5.03.0
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

EPYC Embedded 9755 95.83
+4789%
Ryzen 3 3100U 1.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC Embedded 9755 164010
+4799%
Samples: 3
Ryzen 3 3100U 3348
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 95.83 1.96
Physical cores 128 2
Threads 256 2
Chip lithography 4 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 15 Watt

EPYC Embedded 9755 has a 4789% higher aggregate performance score, 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads, and a 200% more advanced lithography process.

Ryzen 3 3100U, on the other hand, has 3233% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC Embedded 9755 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3100U in performance tests.

Be aware that EPYC Embedded 9755 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3100U is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC Embedded 9755 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 3 3100U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC Embedded 9755 and Ryzen 3 3100U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.