Athlon 3000G vs EPYC Embedded 3451
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1945 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.27 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | AMD Athlon |
| Power efficiency | no data | 7.72 |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Zen+ (2018−2019) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (7 years ago) | 21 November 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $880 | $49 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.15 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | PCIe 3.0 |
| Multiplier | 21.5 | 35 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 2x 213 mm2 | 209.78 mm2? |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AMD BGA SP4r2 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| PowerNow | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | 64 GB? |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC Embedded 3451 and Athlon 3000G.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 6 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 21 November 2019 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 32 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 35 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3451 has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Athlon 3000G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 185.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3451 and AMD Athlon 3000G. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3451 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 3000G is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
