Pentium Extreme Edition 955 vs EPYC Embedded 3401
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 3435 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD EPYC Embedded | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.09 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 21 February 2018 (8 years ago) | 27 December 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $999 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Basic parameters of EPYC Embedded 3401 and Pentium Extreme Edition 955: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.466 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.85 GHz | 0.47 GHz |
| Multiplier | 18.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1536 KB | 16 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 2x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 69 °C |
| Number of transistors | 9600 Million | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC Embedded 3401 and Pentium Extreme Edition 955 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Pentium Extreme Edition 955. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Pentium Extreme Edition 955 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC Embedded 3401 and Pentium Extreme Edition 955. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TiB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 February 2018 | 27 December 2005 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 130 Watt |
EPYC Embedded 3401 has an age advantage of 12 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 53% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC Embedded 3401 and Intel Pentium Extreme Edition 955. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that EPYC Embedded 3401 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Extreme Edition 955 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
