Apple M5 Pro 18-Core vs EPYC 9965

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking310
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency7.74no data
DesignerAMDApple
ManufacturerTSMCno data
Architecture codenameTurin (2024)no data
Release date10 October 2024 (1 year ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$14,813no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores192no data
Threads384no data
Base clock speed2.25 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHzno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache384 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography3 nmno data
64 bit support+-

Compatibility

Information on EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketSP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)500 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes128no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

EPYC 9965 160542
+181%
Samples: 3
Apple M5 Pro 18-Core 57047
Samples: 64

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 9965 and Apple M5 Pro 18-Core. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that EPYC 9965 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M5 Pro 18-Core is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 400 votes

Rate EPYC 9965 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 13 votes

Rate M5 Pro 18-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors EPYC 9965 and M5 Pro 18-Core, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.